The Right Wing Perspective on the Leo Frank Pardon
This review is written to present the christian right winger view on the Leo Frank Pardon, as opposed to the Frankite (Jewish Community and Leo Frank partisan) view on the Pardon. This review offers a unique and controversial view on the Leo Frank pardon that rarely is given a voice, but is shared by many people. Be forewarned and viewer discretion is advised, some of these views can easily be interpreted as antisemitic.
A Review of ‘The Rehabilitation of Leo Frank’ published by Instauration Magazine in June 1986.
Instauration Magazine, (Instauration, /ˌinstôˈrāSHən/ Noun: The action of restoring or renewing something), was a magazine advocating a revival of European-American consciousness, hegemony, and heritage, along with past and present preservationist ideals mixed in with futurist visions.
Right Wingers Called Instauration the High Water Mark of European-American Preservationist Movement
Instauration Magazine was published from 1975 to 2000 by Wilmot Robertson, who was a life long activist and prolific writer promoting the defense and rebirth of White Western Civilization, envisioning a Promethean future for the sons and daughters of Magna Europa. See Metapedia.org for more details on Wilmot Robertson, his production history and the evolution of Instauration Magazine.
The Right-Wing European-American Perspective on the Leo Frank case
In the June 1986 edition of Instauration Magazine, a short article was published on the Jewish Pyrrhic victory of the Leo Frank case, the write up was inspired in part by a breaking story written by Jerry Thompson, a Jewish partisan journalist of the newspaper called the ‘Tennessean’. Thompson helped spark and provide the impetus of enabling Jewish Supremacists (European-American preservationists describe Judaism as a crypto-racist tribal religion and Jews as tribal closet-racists) to achieve one of their crowning achievements in their culture war against European-Americans and Western Civilization, an insolent, humiliating and politically motivated pardon of Leo Frank, 73 years after Frank bludgeoned, raped and strangled Mary Phagan.
The Leo Frank pardon was a final breakthrough for Jewish Supremacism (European-American preservationists describe Judaism as a Jewish Supremacist movement) and Jewsmedia (What right wingers believe is an international media dominated, over represented and controlled by Jews) after 73 years of manipulating the facts of the Leo Frank case, it began in 1982/1983 with the strange culmination of a hokey “death bed” confession by Leo Frank’s former office boy who worked for him back in 1913, Alonzo Mann, a senile octogenarian in the 1980’s with a mountain of medical bills at the end of his bland, uneventful and lonely life, found his 15 minutes of fame, and a partial escape from his debt. The revelation was like mostly all of the evidence ever supporting Leo Frank from 1913 onward, simply put, contrived, half-baked, suspicious and not ever passing the common sense test.
Alonzo Mann claimed he saw Jim Conley at just after noon on April 26, 1913, carrying the dead body of Mary Phagan (down the stairs from the second floor?), and that Conley threatened him with death if he told anyone about it. Mann claimed he was holding on to this life long secret, because after he told his parents about what he saw at the factory on that infamous day, they instructed him not to tell anyone.
It’s Time to Take the Common Sense Test
Pretend you are the parents of Alonzo Mann in 1913 and try a simple common sense test. Pretend yourself to be Mr. and Mrs. Mann living in a Black-White racially segregated south of 1913: In general would White parents instruct their son to keep totally silent about damaging evidence on a lowly black janitor (Jim Conley), one who was being held in jail as a suspected rapist and murderer, thus protecting him, so that instead an upstanding innocent White Jew could die in the guilty Blacks place? Keep this in mind, while your pretending to be Mr. and Mrs. Mann, the Innocent White Jew also happens to be someone who gave your son Alonzo Mann a high profile and coveted job, moreover, the White Jew boss also pay your sons salary on time each week and has a good working business relationship with him. Would you the White parents of Alonzo Mann protect the smelly ignorant black janitor with no ties to your family, or help free the White Jewish boss who gave you son gainful employment? What does your common sense tell you? Does that make sense? or sound questionable? Would you send an “upstanding and innocent” man to his death? to save a “guilty” negro that makes pennies an hour sweeping a factory? Would you sell out the boss who you like and pays your salary, for a custodian? How many different ways can we ask these questions to show it doesn’t pass the common sense test.
What makes matters even more suspicious, is that Alonzo Mann was a defense and character witness of Leo Frank at the 1913 murder trial, simply because Alonzo Mann genuinely liked and supported his boss who he affectionately called Mr. Frank. After all, being an office boy of the National Pencil Company superintendent was a high profile and respected job considering the brutally labor intensive alternatives, and the superintendent office boy position paid a decent wage relatively speaking, because most of Alonzo Manns peers at the factory were grinding and sweating it out in labor intensive positions, at the time, it was like the equivalent of third world slaves laboring tirelessly in a grueling sweatshop environment.
Alonzo Manns office boy position was posh and a piece of cake by comparison to the monotonous labor intensive jobs of his fellow pre-teen and teenaged cohorts at the factory. Office boy jobs of that status were not a dime a dozen, they were rare, saught after and hard to come by considering such a position for a 13 year old boy was coveted by his peers, in a city where such jobs were rarely unoccupied. So what does your common sense tell you?
Put it all together in 73 years
The Instauration article, makes an important point about Alonzo Mann waiting 73 years, why wait so long? How reliable is the testimony of someone 73 years after the fact? Try a final commonsense test one more time, put it all together in context of 73 years, if you worked for someone and you had a genuine affinity for your boss, so much so that when you were called to testify to their defense and on their behalf, you were more than willing and happy to do so, would u leave out coming forth with evidence that would save your boss from being hanged to death? Why would someone have to pull it out of you after seven decades? After all you defended him, he always payed you on time every week and you never had to flop home with grime under your nails and collapse into your bed each night exhausted. Even after Jim Conley was sentenced to 20 years for trying to sneak thief a liquor store, why didn’t you tell? Why did it take 70 years? What does your common sense tell you? Has your bullshit detector gone off yet? or does it need some tuning?
To make matters worse, Frank tried to pin the crime on many different people, first, his Negro Nightwatchman Newt Lee, second, point suspicion of his crime on some of his other current and former employees, then finally, on his lackey custodian, the admitted accomplice-after-the-fact, Jim Conley.
More on the Right Winger View of the Leo Frank Pardon:
The politically correct Jewish pardon came after a relentless 3 year effort from 1983 to 1986 by perfidious and treacherous Jewish Supremacist groups, individuals and sympathizers. The pardon is a symbol of Jewish power and their belief that murdering non-Jews is not a crime, so they demanded forgiveness. The unsubstantiated and defamatory blood libel against Hugh M. Dorsey and Southerners is still smeared on them in virtually every new Jewish book and movie that comes out on the Leo Frank case. The pardon is a major symbol of the Jewish communities contempt against European-Americans, who they view as their eternal racial enemies. The pardon was a major Jewish battle victory, in their permanent cultural War against European-Americans.
Right Wingers Final Conclusion on Jews
The Leo Frank case is part of an endless chain of reminders about the Jews and there can only be one conclusion about letting Jews live amongst Gentiles, Jews are forever and eternally incompatible with Western Civilization and can not live peacefully amongst the descendants of Europeans. As long as Jews live amongst European-Americans or the descendants of Europeans, Whites will terminally suffer and die a slow morbid agonizing death. Jews only know how to antagonize, cause agonizing suffering, instigate reaction and then cry victimhood and persecution when a response they do not like is created. It is an irreconcilable sadomasochistic relationship within a Jew-Gentile and Parasite-Host symbiotic relationship.
The bottom line: Jews are eternally incompatible with Western Civilization and as long as they are allowed to live amongst the descendants of Europeans, Whites where ever they may live, will forever be in painful agonizing decline until their irreversible and ultimate demise.
THE REHABILITATION OF LEO FRANK
Are the Rosenbergs next in line for posthumous pardons?
The rehabilitation of rape-murderer Leo Frank by http://www.instaurationonline.com/ (June 1986)
PARDONING THE UNPARDONABLE
“Our grand old Empire State has been raped!”
In such livid, vivid language did grand old Thomas E. Watson react to the first Frank sellout. Outgoing Governor John M. Slaton had pardoned the very important client of his law firm, Leo M. Frank, on his last days before leaving office. The resulting outrage and tumult led to Slaton being driven –literally –from Georgia, and Frank being dragged from the state prison in Milledgeville and strung up near the grave of Mary Phagan, the 13-year-old girl he was convicted of raping and murdering in 1913.
For 73 years Frank’s friends and racial cousins have been trying to turn the perverted killer into a second Dreyfus. Northern newspapers published articles and cartoons portraying Georgians as vultures, ghouls and savages –all before Frank’s execution. Atlanta Jews bought newspaper ads to inform (warn) the public that even putting Frank on trial was an act of gross anti-Semitism.
Watson, the South’s leading populist, was quite right when he suggested American Jewry was determined that the life of one little Gentile working girl was not worth that of an affluent Jew, educated at Cornell and sent down from New York to manage a sweat shop of underpaid white female Southern teenagers.
Leo Frank Photo
In 1983 the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles was petitioned by the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith to posthumously pardon Leo, who just happened to have been the first president of the Atlanta B’nai B’rith. The grounds for the extraordinary action was the Lazarus-like revivification of the last living eyewitness in the case.
Alonzo Mann, Frank’s office-boy, was “found” by the Nashville Tennesseean’s Jerry Thompson, an “investiga-
PAGE 6 -INSTAURATION –JUNE 1986
tive reporter” (in the vernacular, “professional character assassin”), who had previously infiltrated a klavern of the Ku Klux Klan and had earned a few bucks from the American Jewish Committee for snooping on his own people. In his courageous and disinterested –and dollar-earning -search for truth, he managed to stumble across 84-year-old Mann and his remarkable one-minute-to-midnight confession.
Mann announced –after how much gentle prodding from Thompson we do not know –that after all the multiple years of silence he was finally ready to blow the whistle on the real murderer of Mary Phagan. Thereupon he pointed a gnarled finger at Frank’s colored “sweeper,” a roustabout named Jim Conley, who had been the state’s principal witness against Frank.
Mann disclosed that on that fateful Confederate Memorial Day of 1913, he had walked into the pencil factory and come face to face with Jim Conley carrying the body of Mary Phagan down the stairway. Conley hissed at the young intruder: “If you ever mention this, I’ll kill you.” Frank was nowhere in sight.
The terrorized Mann went home and spilled the beans to his parents, who were evidently the spiritual ancestors of those Long Islanders in 1964, whose tongues refused to wag while they complacently watched the rape-murder of Kitty Genovese. Mom advised young Alonzo to keep his lips sealed.
Conley was arrested five days after the murder. His story was that, on the orders of Frank, he had carried the victim’s body down to the basement in the elevator, not by the stairs, after the latter had done Mary Phagan to death. Once Conley was safely behind bars, Alonzo Mann or his parents might have told the police a different story. Butthey kept as silent as a whisper in deep space.
At Leo Frank’s trial, Alonzo testified as a character witness for his boss. While on the stand he had ample opportunity to “fess up.” How the body was brought down to the basement was a paramount issue of the trial. But the alleged death threat from an incarcerated Negro and the sage advice of his parents kept Mann’s lips sealed.
Frank was convicted. The famed private detective, Wi 1liam Burns, scoured the state, issuing flurries of press releases and promising momentarily to arrest all manner of parties unnamed. Somehow he never got to Mann. Even after Conley received a jail sentence for his part as an accessory to the murder, Mann remained too frightened to speak up. If he had, Frank might never have felt the constriction of that fatal noose. As the years slipped by, no amount of remorse or guilt ever induced him to talk.
Conley was eventually released from jail and died in the early 1960s. Once the threat against his life was finally and forever removed, Mann, if indeed he ever was fearful, could talk without fear. Not a word. Then, in 1983, he was providentially ferreted out by the American Jewish Committee’s hireling, and all this long-repressed knowledge miraculously gushed forth –at what price we can only guess.
The shocking “new evidence” was tailored to erase the presumptuous presumption that a New York Jew, educated at Cornell and married into one of the most aristocratic Hebrew families of Atlanta, could even have been momentarily considered guilty of murder, let alone rape. True, Frank’s stories to police and his efforts to throw blame on several other parties might look somewhat suspicious to bigoted eyes, but thanks to the moral standards of the late 20th century, such irrelevancies are to be consigned to the ashcan of legal trivia. An earlier era’s liberals might have applauded the “intolerant” Georgia of 1913 for taking the word of a Negro over a white man, but today that kind of affirmative action is unacceptable when the white man is Jewish.
The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, as reported earlier in Instauration (june 1984), failed to respond to the first highly publicized appeal for a posthumous pardon for Frank based on Mann’s revelations. Rejecting Jewish pressures, it decided this “new evidence” by no means proved his innocence. In fact, inside information from the board indicated that certain blacks in and out of public office were outraged at Jewish attempts to blame a Negro for Mary Phagan’s murder. Who was the most blatant booster for the pardon? Our old friend, Jerry Thompson. No doubt he saw Pulitzer Prizes and movie rights and front-page bylines in his rosy crystal ball. Even Jews did not have the energy to match his round-the-clock pestering of board members.
When the loudmouthed media lobbying failed, quieter and stealthier influences went to work.
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution (March 12, 1986) had it just about right:
[Pardons and Paroles Board] members were happy when Louis Kunian, Jewish businessman, contacted the state last year and asked renewed board consideration of the case …. The board informed Kunian that in all likelihood, it “would be happy to grant a pardon that didn’t say anything about guilt or innocence … . ” And that led to three private meetings between Jewish community leaders and the board.
The meetings paid off. The pardon was signed, sealed and sent out on the world’s news tickers. At long last Paroles Board Chairman Wayne Snow said he could hold his head up. “Our earlier decision was depicted as evidence that it was still Tobacco Road down here and we weren’t interested in doing the right thing.”
The radio news was especially amusing. The board was said to have two objectives: (1) to “bind up the wounds” that sensitive Jews have suffered for the indignities and injustices heaped upon them for the past 73 years; (2) since the state had failed to protect him, Georgians owed Frank something. After all, his appeals had only been rejected by the u.S. Supreme Court twice and by Georgia courts five times; (3) as the ADL had been kind enough to point out, Frank would never have been convicted today on the standards of evidence of 1913. Item (3) brings up a question. Will the ADL of B’nai B’rith seek to have posthumous pardons for more Jewish murderers (such as Louis Lepke, et al.) who did not have the advantages of a college education, wealthy relatives, Miranda rights and an organized press clique?
From Mount Olympus or Stone Mountain, the Frank controversy can be viewed as a struggle between two races with a long history. Southerners of 1913 still imagined they were a people with a chivalric past. Haunted by images of cavaliers, moonlight and magnolias, they would never turn their backs on the tragic end of a little girl violated and killed by an outsider. Mary Phagan was not just an ordinary human being; she was a Southern girl. Her fate shocked Southerners of both high and low estate. The “lynch mob” was made up of leaders of Marietta society, including retired judges, businessmen and ministers. Those men decided to fight against what they saw as a relentless media and political campaign to ensure that justice was not done.
Mary Phagan –symbol of Southern womanhood
The corrupting, odorous smog of money and power polluted the entire Georgia landscape during the Frank case. Since the champions of Mary Phagan could not fight dollar for dollar, they armed themselves with guts and stick-at-it-ness. Much as their parents had charged countless emplacements of blue-jacketed foes, the “Knights of Mary Phagan” were determined that this fight should be fought away from smoke-filled back rooms and courtrooms. They saw this course as a strategy of honor.
Those opposed to the Southern ethos, those defined in their own holy book as a “proud and stiff-necked people,”
INSTAURATION –JUNE 1986 –PAGE 7
were equally determined that one of their own should not die unavenged. For more than seven decades they fought a sly and subtle propaganda war. No books were printed to confirm the guilt of Leo Frank. Instead, volume after volume, magazine article after magazine article, newspaper story after newspaper story and even an early motion picture ballyhooed the Frank side. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution was unable to let more than a year or two pass without a new article on the shame that is Georgia’s for not allowing the judicial process to remain bought. In reference-to the Frank case, Jewish negotiator Louis Kunian remarked, “We’ve been around for 3,000 years. We’re used to patience.” Once again the patient approach won. Although Alonzo Mann didn’t live to see it, Frank finally got his pardon –without reflection on his guilt or innocence, of course –although that legal nicety will be quickly obscured.
Broadway plays, movies, TV miniseries, docudramas and a 6,OOO-page novel by Leon Uris to follow. Hit tune, “Holocaust in Georgia,” now being composed, lyrics by Johnny Paycheck, music by Irving Berlin. Stick around. After the victory comes the incessant, repetitive, maudlin, century-long victory celebration.
Original Source: http://www.instaurationonline.com/pdf-files/Instauration-1986-06-June-pt1.pdf Instauration, Volume 11, No. 7, June 1986.
Instauration Magazine Online: http://www.instaurationonline.com/
The Jeffersonian Newspaper on Leo M. Frank (70% complete): http://leofrank.org/images/jeffersonian/