<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>T. H. Willet &#8211; The Leo Frank Case Research Library</title>
	<atom:link href="https://leofrank.info/tag/t-h-willet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://leofrank.info</link>
	<description>Information on the 1913 bludgeoning, rape, strangulation and mutilation of Mary Phagan and the subsequent trial, appeals and mob lynching of Leo Frank in 1915.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 19:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Witness Admits Discrepancies in Model of Pencil Factory</title>
		<link>https://leofrank.info/witness-admits-discrepancies-in-model-of-pencil-factory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chief Curator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 19:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Factory model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Frank Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. H. Willet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://leofrank.info/?p=15963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another in our series of new transcriptions of contemporary articles on the Leo Frank case. Atlanta ConstitutionAugust 9th, 1913 T. H. Willet, a pattern maker, who built the model of the pencil factory, was next called by the defense. Under the cross-examination of Mr. Hooper he frequently admitted discrepancies in the pasteboard structure submitted by Frank’s counsel. “What is your occupation?” he <a class="more-link" href="https://leofrank.info/witness-admits-discrepancies-in-model-of-pencil-factory/">Continue Reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full"><a href="https://leofrank.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/witness-admits-discrepancies.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1207" height="807" src="https://leofrank.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/witness-admits-discrepancies.png" alt="" class="wp-image-15966" srcset="https://leofrank.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/witness-admits-discrepancies.png 1207w, https://leofrank.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/witness-admits-discrepancies-300x201.png 300w, https://leofrank.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/witness-admits-discrepancies-680x455.png 680w, https://leofrank.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/witness-admits-discrepancies-768x513.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1207px) 100vw, 1207px" /></a></figure></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Another in <a href="https://www.leofrank.info/announcement-original-1913-newspaper-transcriptions-of-mary-phagan-murder-exclusive-to-leofrank-org/">our series</a> of new transcriptions of contemporary articles on the Leo Frank case.</strong></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph"><em>Atlanta Constitution</em><br>August 9<sup>th</sup>, 1913</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">T. H. Willet, a pattern maker, who built the model of the pencil factory, was next called by the defense. Under the cross-examination of Mr. Hooper he frequently admitted discrepancies in the pasteboard structure submitted by Frank’s counsel.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What is your occupation?” he was asked by Mr. Arnold.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Pattern maker.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Did you make an inspection of the National Pencil factory?”<br>“Yes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In making this model, as to its dimensions and proportions, you have followed exact figures of blue prints?”<br>“Yes.”</p>



<span id="more-15963"></span>



<p class="has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Under Cross-examination.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He was then cross-examined by Mr. Hooper.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You do not know whether this is a correct representation or not?”<br>“It was made from the figures given me.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Did you make measurements or not?”<br>“No.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Did you see the factory?”<br>“I saw the front end.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Are these parts in the basement correct?”<br>“I made them so they would be plain to view.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You made them incorrect, then, so they would be plain to view?”<br>“I made them so they would be to view.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Weren’t these front doors made to exaggerafe [sic] true conditions?”<br>“I made them according to the blue prints given me.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Didn’t you leave out everything on the southern side of the basement?”<br>The witness nodded an answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Would you tell the jury that these windows are accurate?”<br>“No.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Do you pretend to say these windows in the second floor are correct, too?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I don’t know.”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Discrepancies Admitted.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Somebody else put these windows there, didn’t they?”<br>“I didn’t.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What about the stairway? Is it correct?”<br>“It is according to the blue prints.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This hole in the trap door isn’t in proportion to the blue prints, is it?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I didn’t measure it?”<br>“So, in question of measurements, that trap door isn’t correct as to the trap door?”<br>“No.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mr. Arnold again took the witness on direct examination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“On what plans was this model built, ground or height?”<br>“Ground plans.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The model is magnified thrice from the blue print, isn’t it?”<br>“Yes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Didn’t you do your best to conform with the blue prints?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Yes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Did you have instructions from anyone to make the model false to the prints?”<br>“No.”</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph">* * *</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.leofrank.info/library/atlanta-constitution-issues/1913/atlanta-constitution-august-09-1913-saturday-14-pages.pdf"><em>Atlanta Constitution</em>, August 9th 1913, &#8220;Witness Admits Discrepancies in Model of Pencil Factory,&#8221; Leo Frank case newspaper article series (Original PDF)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
